By Chris Trueman, Associate at Paine Edmonds LLP, Vancouver Personal Injury Lawyer
If you have been in a car accident or otherwise injured due to the negligence of others, you have two years from the date of the accident to start a lawsuit. Failure to file your lawsuit within the two year limitation period can be fatal to your case.
If you are dealing injuries suffered in a car accident, ICBC
has no duty to tell you about your two-year limitation period. Reasons were released today in Field v.
Harvey, 2012 BCSC 456. In dismissing
the injured party’s claim, Mr. Justice Bracken had this to say:
[6]
There was no further activity on the matter until July 31, 2009, when an ICBC
adjuster telephoned the plaintiff’s home and left a message inquiring about her
injuries. No response was received to that message.
[7]
As she had heard nothing further from the plaintiff, the adjuster closed
her file on October 2, 2009.
The next time the plaintiff contacted ICBC
was not until November 24, 2010,
almost sixteen months later. As the limitation period had expired by that
point, the adjuster advised the plaintiff of the provisions of the Limitations
Act and reminded her of the attempts to contact her. The plaintiff advised
the adjuster that she had been too busy to return the calls. The plaintiff was
advised to contact the adjuster’s manager to discuss matters further
…
[30]
It is clear from the case law that ICBC
was under no obligation to warn the plaintiff that the limitation period had
commenced, was not postponed, and would soon expire. It also clear that ICBC
abided by the “preferred course” of action, as articulated by Huddart J.A.
in Balzer, by including the following notification in their
correspondence with the plaintiff:
Nothing herein contained is or
shall be construed as either an admission of liability on the part of the
insured or a waiver or extension of any applicable limitation period. It is
evident that the plaintiff received this notification, given her handwritten
reply on the letter in question and this statement should have alerted the
plaintiff to the existence of the limitation period.
It is evident that the plaintiff
received this notification given her hand written reply on the letter. The
content of the letter should have alerted the plaintiff to the possible
existence of a limitation period that might affect her claim.
…
[38]
Limitation periods exist, in part, to encourage plaintiffs to bring
their actions in a timely manner. The plaintiff has failed to bring her action
in a timely manner and has not satisfied this court that there exists a lawful
reason for her failure to comply with the provisions of the Limitation Act.
If you have been dealing with your accident claim on your own
and are approaching the two-year anniversary mark, please contact our office
immediately to discuss your claim.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.